Creditors behind a proposed rescue of Thames Water still expect to negotiate with the new government, even as they prepare legal contingencies in case ministers reject their bid.
A source close to the London & Valley Water consortium told the outlet that talks with the administration remain likely, though no discussions have yet taken place. The incoming Prime Minister Andy Burnham has not indicated whether he will support a private restructuring or push for public control.
Creditors hold £17bn of Thames Water’s debt
The group—led by Apollo Global Management, Elliott Management, Farallon Capital Management, and Silver Point Capital—owns roughly £17 billion of the company’s £21 billion debt. Their latest proposal includes £3.35 billion in fresh equity, £6.25 billion in new borrowing, and writing off £9.6 billion of existing debt.
Those familiar with the plan say they’ve refined it since environment secretary Emma Reynolds criticized the original version. They believe the updated terms could still gain government approval instead of being dismissed.
The investors also argue that existing legal protections would require full compensation for senior creditors if the utility were nationalized. This position has sparked speculation about potential legal challenges, though no action has been taken.
Sky News reported that the consortium had hired litigation firm Pallas Partners to explore options if ministers choose special administration or public ownership. The source confirmed that contingency planning was a precaution, not an immediate threat.
Related: Tribute band concert saves fans big money
Cash crunch looms before year’s end
Thames Water warned this week that it expects to run out of cash before December without a long-term funding solution. The creditors, however, have said they’re prepared to keep financing the company into 2027 if necessary.
Their proposal would maintain creditor control before returning the utility to private ownership through a stock market listing in about five years. They’ve also suggested offering shares to customers and delaying dividends until the 2030s.
Burnham has previously stated the company should be brought under public control, but his government has not yet clarified its position. The lack of engagement leaves the utility’s future uncertain, though the consortium remains determined to press its case.
Rejection of the bid could trigger prolonged legal and financial disputes. For now, both sides appear to be waiting for the new government to finalize its cabinet before serious discussions begin.
The clock is ticking. Any funding disruption could affect infrastructure projects and household bills. Its ability to maintain operations depends on a resolution—whether through private investment, government action, or a contentious legal battle.
The consortium insists it prefers negotiation. But with billions at stake, they are prepared to defend their position if the government moves in another direction.
